Thursday, May 30, 2013


re:  CLIP OF THE WEEK
Just got this from FH Reader Frank B ... who tells us:   

This is fascinating. The Miami Dolphins Cheerleaders did a dance video to “Call Me Maybe.” U.S. troops stationed in Afghanistan saw it and did their own version, matching the cheerleaders scene-by scene. Here are the two videos together.



Dang!  Wish I woulda had this in time for Memorial Day!  GREAT Clip!  Thanks, Frank!  (kk)

re: ON THE RADIO:  
Hey Kent,  
I forgot to mention this to you in my first email regarding the WABC Rewound weekend. I had it on most of the time when I was in the house. I kept paying attention to my Son who is 20 when he would come in the room and I was totally amazed at how many of the songs he knew. Songs that he didn't necessarily hear from his old man. I think he was surprised as well. He made the comment that if radio sounded like this he'd listen. Neither he nor his Friends ever moved on to the regular channels passed the time spent with Disney Radio when they were pre-teens.  
Bill  
 
Kent,
You were right, of course, when you posted in FH the original version of WATERBOY by Don Shirley, as opposed to the version which you had posted first. Like some of your readers which you alluded to in FH, I like to think that I still have an "ear" for this music in that I remember exactly how it was being played and heard on the radio. Pretty amazing isn't it that one can remember how something went fifty years ago on the radio as you said.
Just today the morning DJ played SHOUT! by the Isley Brothers. Wait a minute! I take that back. He payed a song or two after that and didn't say who it was. It was the song SHOUT!. But if it were the Isley Brothers, they were singing in a different key than what I have heard them in the past. Kent, I had never heard this version on the radio before. Maybe if someone requested it and hadn't heard it in years, maybe they wouldn't know the difference.
Larry

For years here in Chicago if you heard "Shout" on the radio it was most likely the Otis Day and the Knights version from "Animal House" ... The Isley Brothers' version rarely got played. ("Shout" is one of those rare rock and roll oldies that is bigger in its "after life" than it ever was on the charts. Released twice, this record never even made Billboard's Top 40 ... yet is part of the permanent rock and roll landscape. Cover versions have been recorded by just about everybody ... even The Beatles did it on "Shindig!" and "Ready, Steady, Go", despite never actually recording the song.) Despite its poor chart performance, the song is honored in both the Grammy and The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame ... yet peaked at #47 in 1959. Their version of "Twist And Shout" fared a little bit better in 1962, reaching #17 on the Billboard Pop Singles Chart. The Isley's biggest pop hit didn't come until 1969 when "It's Your Thing" climbed to #2. (kk)



I basically quit listening to contemporary radio in the 70’s. By the time Disco had polluted the charts and airwaves I was done for the most part. By the late 70’s radio was disco crap, Rock became Shlock. Pop became Poop! Turned to the Punk / New Wave scene for a couple of years until that fizzled, concentrated on oldies stations for a while until the playlists became moronic, and then concentrated on a record store and seeking out the unusual older tunes that sounded like the 50’s & 60’s hits and in some cases were better. Haven’t missed current radio at all because the “hits” became whatever you want to call what this modern dreck is. There is always hundreds of old airchecks or the occasional foray in to internet oldies radio with shows like Dave the Rave!
Ken


re: DIGGIN' FORGOTTEN HITS:  
forgotten hits is the best damn rock 'n roll website on the country.
chet coppock
   


You are the leader of The American Oldies Movement -- Keep The Music Alive! There's really nobody left out there doing what you do. Forgotten Hits has a corner on the oldies market.  
Scott Shannon   

Apparently CRS is running rampant in this house, or at least with me. I wanted to tell you something about how much I enjoy your magazine. I love the history you print. But unfortunately I completely forgot what I wanted to say. Maybe you should just forget this letter.  
the great and wonderful Malcolm (I think)

Thanks, Malcolm ... hey, if it comes back to you later, let me know. (lol) Just not at three in the morning! (kk)



WILDWOOD, NEW JERSEY ... New Jersey beach town considers banning baggy pants and requiring shirts be worn after 8 pm ...
GONNA HAVE TO CLEAN UP YOUR ACT KENT!
-- Gary Renfield
Stop making fun of the way I dress!!!!! (kk)





Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Mid-Week Musings

re: ON THE RADIO:
Wow! It's been so fun to hear the WABC airchecks. Growing up in North Dakota, we did get to hear the Chicago stations, and I'm a huge WLS fan from those days. I loved WCFL as well. Also listened to KOMA lots, too. I never got to hear WABC out of New York though, but being a radio freak as a kid I knew about it for sure. I think I caught it a couple times visiting my Sister in either Wisconsin or Indiana but it didn't last but a few minutes.
I finally got to hear some WABC airchecks from the DJ's I haunted at our local stations when I was in high school. Some of them had copies of Programmer's Digest that they'd pass to me to listen to.
Boy, if any of the radio programmers out there today listened to any of the stuff on Rewound Radio and didn't figure out how crappy radio is these days, then they never will get it.
Man oh man, no wonder we are all as crazy about the music and DJ's we listened to as we are.
Bill
Some folks on the list downplay the impact these jocks and this music had ... but we evidenced another example just the other day. One of our readers wrote in about the minor hit "Water Boy" by The Don Shirley Trio. This record BARELY made The Top 40, peaking AT #40 in Billboard in 1961 ... and it has not made the cut in the way of "desirable" music to be kept alive by radio in the decades since. It's probably safe to say that MOST radio stations across the country haven't played it since it fell off the charts way back when. (And that's if they played it at all back in the day. As we saw during our discussion, the record fared a little better here in The Midwest ... but back then you were more likely to hear an instrumental heading into a newscast ... especially a low-charting one!)
Yet THREE readers wrote in to say that the version we featured wasn't the one they remembered hearing on the radio back then. The memory of this obscure semi-hit was SO strong that, even fifty years later, they knew it wasn't the right version.
In that same posting, one of our readers asked about a song that never even charted nationally ... a song he hadn't heard since 1959 called "Let Her Go". He was BEYOND thrilled when one of our readers tracked it down so that we could feature it again. Timeless, meaningful memories.
Radio doesn't create these anymore ... not when they're all playing the exact same music by the exact same artists ... and drilling it into our heads countless times a day. Radio has become "Groundhog Day" ... it's Groundhog Day Programming and nothing more. That's why a station like Rewound Radio is such a breath of fresh air. They haven't forgotten all of the OTHER songs that helped to fill out the dial back in the day. They understand that you can program in a mix of ALL of this music and play it side by side again, just like they did back then. Add a few personality-driven jocks to this station and you've got a winner.
SOMEBODY out there has to take a chance on this on the terrestrial dial. The audience is out there ... fact is, you just don't know how to market to it! Your mindset is that the ONLY sponsor who might be interested in advertising on a station like this is Depends (or some other "bodily function" company!!!) When in fact if you simply went after the oldies cruiselines and cities like Laughlin, NV and Branson, MO that cater to this audience you could probably create a win/win situation for everybody. The listeners are happy, hearing the music they really want to hear (instead of the same 200-300 force-fed tracks you're giving them now), the station is happy because it's making money with the right advertising, and the advertisers are happy because they're reaching an audience that will actually use and appreciate their facilities.
Instead of dumbing it down for the listeners, try dumbing it down on a programming and marketing level to the most basic equation ... go out and FIND and solicit the businesses that will appeal to these listeners ... and they will reward you with ratings, loyalty and appreciation. (kk)
Listen for a couple of hours today ... and see what radio COULD sound like: Click here: Rewound Radio
The set I heard at 6:10 this morning included "Hold The Line" by Toto, "Things I'd Like To Say" by The New Colony Six", "Bloody Well Right" by Supertramp and "Time Won't Let Me" by The Outsiders" ... followed by a mix of "South Street" by The Orlons, "Take It To The Limit" by The Eagles, "Walk Like A Man" by The Four Seasons, "Shilo" by Neil Diamond and by "That's All You Gotta Do" by Brenda Lee, followed by a plug for Gary Theroux's "History Of Rock And Roll" snippets, airing three times daily. "A Girl Like You" by The Young Rascals kicked off the next set, followed by "Let Me Serenade You" by Three Dog Night and "Runaway" by Del Shannon ... "Talk Talk" by Music Machine (tell me THIS guy isn't reading Forgotten Hits!!!  Lol), "Baby Love" by The Supremes ... and then it was time to post. Jocks ... wouldn't you LOVE playing this kind of variety on YOUR show?!?!? (kk)
 
re: THIS AND THAT:
>>>C'mon ... what would Monday Morning be like if I didn't complain about radio??? (kk)
Tuesday morning?
Shelley 
 
Hey, Kent,
Going to see the Stones Monday ... it'll mark six different decades in which I've seen the group.
Chet  
 
>>>Gary created a worldwide sporting event anthem ... which has since been totally eclipsed by Gary's fondness for little boys. (kk)
Not that it makes much difference, but in the interest of publishing "The Real Truth," Gary Glitter's fondness is for little girls, not little boys.
Ron Smith
No, I flubbed it ... people have a right to know just who Gary's been fondling! (kk)  
 
Years ago we ran a story about the true origins of the #1 Hit "Midnight Train To Georgia" by Gladys Knight and the Pips ... FH Reader David Lewis just sent us this new video clip, interviewing the song's writer Jim Weatherly, who retells the tale. (This has been a welcome addition to Scott Shannon's "Rock And Roll Remakes" Weekend ... we just LOVE finding these great stories and rare tracks.) kk
 
I happened across this again the other day and just had to share it again. So much fun ... and so much joy in Randy Bachman's voice when he stumbles across "the lost chord"!!! (kk)
 
>>>Is it true Robbie Krieger, the Doors guitar player wrote all their songs but the group agreed to have them credited to "The Doors"??? (Carolyn)
>>>I've not heard that but I don't believe it's true ... if for no other reason than the fact that Jim Morrison was a poet first ... and it was setting Jim's songs to music that launched the band in the first place. Alluding to what you mentioned earlier, the keyboard sound was an integral part of the make-up of The Doors ... I believe they all contributed to the end result. (kk)
UPDATE:  Interestingly enough, the day after I ran these comments I saw this blurb printed in Brian Forsythe's new book "Inside The Songs Of The Sixties":
The Doors song "Tell All The People", written by guitarist Robbie Krieger, and found on their "The Soft Parade" LP, prompted Jim Morrison to insist on individual writing credits so people could identify which band member wrote which song. He objected to the line "Tell all the people get your guns" and didn't want his fans to think that he wrote these lyrics.  
 
Sid Holmes tells us that they're making some headway in collecting the royalties due J. Frank Wilson's family ... I received this update the other day: 
Utilizing the contract I had with J. Frank Wilson (1-22-63 to 1-22-66) Rodney (J. Frank's son) and I are making some progress. Our goal is to take control of all recordings made between the above dates when he was under contract with me. Thanks to SoundScan, I will now be receiving 20% of all downloads internationally for the songs listed. Rodney's checks the past months have run between $300 to $900. From here he will be going head to head with Rhino Records (TimeWarner), Columbia, Cicadelic Records (Ron Newdoll) etc. If they can produce a contract prior to mine concerning making recordings with J. Frank Wilson, they are home free. If they can't, then Rodney will present them with a copy mine. After reading my book and the contract in the book he took action. He, his family, his sister and mom (Frank's ex) all agreed it was Frank's signature and he was of legal age when he signed it with a notary.
Basically, Rodney is doing the work as I just supply him with the facts on who did what and when. Rodney claims to have turned down an unofficial offer of $20,000 from one label. Last I heard he had been in contact with a music attorney in Nashville.
Sid Holmes 
 
Kent ...
Watching Yankees vs. Mets, on mute & listening to WCBS - FM.
Here's the top 20 of the Top 500.
1 - Hey Jude = Beatles
2 - Billie Jean = Michael Jackson
3 - December, 1963 ( Oh What A Night ) = Four Seasons
4 - Every Breath You Take = Police
5 - Night Fever = Bee Gees
6 - Don't Stop Believing = Journey
7 - American Pie = Don McLean
8 - Hotel California = Eagles
9 - Big Girls Don't Cry = Four Seasons
10 - Bette Davis Eyes = Kim Carnes
11 - I Want To Hold Your Hand = Beatles
12 - Call Me = Blonde
13 - I'm A Believer = Monkees
14 - Eye Of The Tiger = Survivor
15 - Joy To The World = Three Dog Night
16 - I Love Rock-n- Roll = Joan Jett
17 - Maggie May = Rod Stewart
18 - Le Freak = Chic
19 - Shadow Dancing = Andy Gibb
20 - I Heard It Through The Grapevine = Marvin Gaye
I long for the old WCBS-FM Countdowns. Year after year you could be sure that the top three were
1 - In The Still Of The Night = Five Satins
2 - Earth Angel = Penguins
3 - Tonite, Tonite = Mellow - Kings
Since all three songs are from the 1950's, they don't even qualify for this countdown (1960's, 1970's, 1980's).
Frank B.
Yeah, if you want the full gamut of music, you'll have to wait for Ron Smith's Labor Day Countdown (which now only tabulates your votes every other year ... but at least you get '50's, '60's and '70's!) kk
You're guaranteed to find a few surprises up near the top of this list! (kk) 
 
On the other hand, very FEW surprises on WCBS-FM's Top 500 Countdown ...
Pretty much everything you expect to hear ... and DO hear ... on a daily basis:
Kent ...
Here's the whole list for your readers who might be interested. You shouldn't look at it. I don't want to upset you.
Frank B.

Kent ...
Interesting project. I just made a pledge.
People like this need help. I don't mind helping.
When the Rascals ask for money, it bothers me.
Frank B.
A lot of people had a problem with The Rascals and Stevie VanZandt asking for money to launch their reunion project ... it's like if they didn't believe in it enough to invest their own money, why would others in a far lesser financial position be interested in investing? Sure, we ALL wanted to see them get back together and be successful ... but now we're going to spend additional money on merchandise, concert tickets (and in some cases airline tickets!), new recordings, etc.  
 
From Tom Cuddy:
My Music: Burt Bacharach's Best Debuts June 1, 2013 on PBS (check local listings) - Celebrating the Legendary Songwriter With Performances By The Artists Who Made His Music Famous -
-- For over half a century, the immensely popular and immediately identifiable melodies of composer Burt Bacharach have touched millions of music lovers around the world. Bacharach established himself in the 1960s as a topical successor to his Tin Pan Alley predecessors, creating some of the most beloved and successful pop music ever to grace radio, television and film. Hosted by Robert Wagner, this first-time ever archival PBS special includes all the original artists performing Bacharach's hits with rare footage and clips from the 1960s -1980s. 
MY MUSIC: BURT BACHARACH'S BEST premieres on PBS stations beginning June 1, 2013 (check local listings).  
Bacharach teamed with lyricist Hal David for a stunning run of classic songs, many in tandem with Dionne Warwick (Walk On By, I Say A Little Prayer, Alfie). British songbird Dusty Springfield introduced the seductive standard The Look Of Love while Tom Jones popularized the playful What's New Pussycat?, Her Alpert romanticized with This Guy's In Love With You and Jackie DeShannon touched hearts with the iconic What The World Needs Now Is Love. The smashes continued in the seventies when The Carpenters reached #1 with (They Long To Be) Close To You, following another number one evergreen, Raindrops Keep Fallin' On My Head, the Oscar-winning tune sung by B.J. Thomas in the film Butch Cassidy & The Sundance Kid. Soul-pop ensemble The Fifth Dimension presents the sultry ballad One Less Bell To Answer.
The 1980s witnessed more Bacharach chart-toppers such as Arthur's Theme by Christopher Cross and That's What Friends Are For by Dionne Warwick, Stevie Wonder, Gladys Knight & Elton John. Burt Bacharach continues to perform concerts across the globe and his autobiography, Anyone Who Had A Heart, has just been published by HarperCollins.
Included in the special are clips of:
• Austin Powers Intro “Ladies and Gentlemen, Mr. Burt Bacharach”• “Walk On By” – Dionne Warwick
• “I Say a Little Prayer” – Dionne Warwick
• “Any Day Now” – Chuck Jackson
• “What’s New Pussycat?” – Tom Jones
• “The Look of Love” – Dusty Springfield
• “This Guy’s in Love With You” – Herb Alpert
• “This Girl’s in Love With You” – Dionne Warwick
• “Alfie” – Dionne Warwick
• “Raindrops Keep Fallin’ on My Head” – B.J. Thomas
• “One Less Bell to Answer” – The Fifth Dimension
• “What the World Needs Now Is Love” – Jackie DeShannon
• “(They Long to Be) Close to You” – The Carpenters
• “A House Is Not a Home” – Burt Bacharach and Dusty Springfield
• “Arthur’s Theme” – Christopher Cross and Burt Bacharach with Carole Bayer Sager
• “That’s What Friends Are For” – Elton John, Dionne Warwick, Stevie Wonder and Gladys Knight

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Helping Out Our Readers


re: FATHER SEBASTIAN:  
>>>I couldn't find the Lenny Welch track mentioned ... and am wondering if it is the same song that we featured by The Ramblers. Anybody know for sure? (kk)  
Yes, yes it is ...  
Tom Diehl  


>>>Thanks for the info on how high WATERBOY by Don Shirley got on WLS back in 1961. The version you posted was a little bit different than the one played here in OKC. My version (45 on Cadence) is 2:56 in length. Your version appeared to have the first 15 or so seconds cut out with the ending a little bit different. From what I was told years ago and know, the LP version is somewhat 4 minutes long. (Larry Neal)  
I remember this song, and the version you posted is also different from the version played on WLS, even though I've heard your version on Oldies Radio, including Real Oldies. I've attached the version that WLS played.  
Ed Erxleben  


As I stated at the time, I wasn't familiar with the song at all ... and went with the only copy I had, coming off a compilation CD called "Instrumental Gems". If your copy comes from the Cadence single that charted, I'd have to agree that it's the one that radio most likely played. At the time, I suggested listening to Randy Price's excellent Instrumental Series, currently available through outlets like Collectors Choice Music and Amazon. Randy has compiled EVERY charted instrumental hit from the '60's and is releasing them year by year through an arrangement with Eric Records. (You can also order these CDs ... and a host of others ... through Eric's website ... link below) kk  
Click here: ERIC RECORDS: Original Versions & the Highest Quality Sound     

Kent,
The stereo version of "Water Boy" on the 1961 edition of Complete Pop Instrumental Hits of the 60s matches the Cadence 45 release. (The mono single version can be found on The History Of Cadence Records - Vol. 2, Varese VSD-5579). Note that the Complete Pop Instrumental series of CDs is being released on the European Complete 60s label (not Eric Records), even though they are available for ordering on the Eric Records website (http://www.ericrecords.com/index.html). 
– Randy   


>>>That leaves me with one last forgotten hit from that year (1960). It doesn't appear on any searches but I can almost recite it word for word. The title (pretty sure) was "Let Her Go". Singer was male, solo artist, sounded a little like Bobby Rydell, Frankie Avalon or maybe Johnny Tillotson. George Hamilton IV and Bobby Vee would both be a bit of a stretch and in reality I think it was a one-hit wonder who just had a good-sounding voice. So far nothing appears when I do a search.
I can almost recite the entire song lyrics if that will help. It starts out this way:
"Let her go - - run away. Let her go I - - didn't say.
I'll pretend - this will end, so I won't have to -
Let her go. No, no, no, no -
(Second verse) similar to first.
Chorus:

"I know she'll never find love as ah... true as mine.
"One day she'll find me away and -
"She - will pi-i-ne"
"Let her go ... (repeat first verse) ... (repeat last line). (Fade & end)"
Best I can do after fifty-three years. I was twelve then. I'll be sixty-five this year.
I'd just like to find out who did this one before I kick the bucket.

Thanks for all you do. You guys are tops. Really you are.
Best Always-
Bill Fife,
Ocala, FL
>>>Somebody out there is going to know this one. (Nothing in Joel's Billboard book titled "Let Her Go" from the early '60's) ... but these lyrics I'm sure will spark somebody's memory out there ... so stay tuned! (kk)

And it didn't take long at all! FH Reader Tom Diehl got back to us later that same night!
Bill Fife, I can guarantee that I have found your song. Why Kent didn't ask me to begin with, I don't know!
It's "Let Her Go" by Randy Hard on the NRC record label from ... 1959.
It's a nice little
song that I first heard in January, 2012 (at least, that's when I downloaded it after I heard Alex Galbraith play it on his Platter Party show on Top Shelf Oldies) and I had forgotten about since then ... until it turned up in a search of my computer for songs called Let Her Go ... it was the first one (out of many with that title) that I checked, and I feel I didn't have to check further.
-- Tom Diehl
Here you go, Bill ... is this your song? (kk)

 
OMG!
There is a Heaven!!
I know because you guys are proof.
How can I thank you enough??
... I Can Not Believe What I Am Hearing.
OK. I take back what I said.
... Now I believe in miracles.
 
No ... I better not say any more.
You guys are beyond the Top.
I can die now.
Thank You.  
Bill Fife,
Ocala, FL
Originally from
Atlanta, GA
(OMG!!!
You really DID it!)
Last time I heard this I was eleven!
(Not sure ... but I THINK what he's saying is ... Thanks, Tom!!!) kk
I'm always glad to be of as much help as I can be. If Bill had simply said "the title is Let Her Go" I would've come up with several different titles, Bill's having even a partial memory of lyrics certainly helped in a big way. And I just love being able to flood someone's memory banks by reintroducing them to a tune they haven't heard in decades ... long before I was even on this earth. It just goes to show that somehow, someway, somewhere, this music will still be around long after I'm gone, too.
-- Tom Diehl  
 

Hi, Kent,  
Just one last question -  
Whom do I have to THANK for this unbelievable FIND!  
For years searches would turn up everything from Country songs to Hip Hop / Rap of every description -
I was beginning to think that maybe I'd just dreamed it all up. I really had right about 99% given up. But there is always that tiny thread of hope -
I have some more thoughts on this record. Like why it was forgotten when it seems like such a well-produced and professionally polished work. And another surprise: Randy Hard and the Hi-Lites had something in common with me and Tommy Roe: he is also from Atlanta! Hiding in plain sight looks like ... I mean who knew?
I just wanted to say thanks to whoever it was that unearthed this little gem from my best years. The soundtrack of our lives was never more true than was this ...
So - All My Best To All Of You;
May Neither You, Nor Forgotten Hits, Ever Be Forgotten!
Bill
The guy who came up with it was Tom Diehl ... and I passed your note of appreciation along to him. Tom has helped us out numerous times in the past ... he's a GREAT resource for this kind of thing.  These are the kind of stories that make for good reading in Forgotten Hits ... honestly, I think we're batting somewhere around 95% ... we have a HUGE network of readers who LOVE this music as much as we do ... they also enjoy helping to add music and memories that matter to other like-minded individuals out there ... and together, this all makes for a pretty good combination. Glad we could help! (kk)

Monday, May 27, 2013

Monday Morning Radio Rant

C'mon ... what would Monday Morning be like if I didn't complain about radio?!?!?
 
Got this from Ron Smith Saturday Morning:
Ronnie Rice does not even own a computer. But every once in awhile, he passes things along to his webmaster. This appeared on Ronnie's Facebook page early Saturday morning and clearly wasn't ghost-written:
"This is Ronnie Rice speaking: I have known schmucks before, but Jan Jefferies at WLS-FM takes the cake. This weekend (5/24/13 - 5/26/13) was dedicated to Chicago's Own. Knowing there are listeners who love their own Chicago bands, why did this moron eliminate The Shadows of Knight, The Cryan Shames and The New Colony 6? He's not from Chicago but he should know better. Not only is it an insult to the forerunners of Chicago bands, but also an insult to the fans. Now I know two Dicks at WLS, and Jan you are one of them."
lol ... too funny. And absolutely true ... the last time he put together a Chicago tribute weekend we got Chicago, The Buckinghams and Styx ... and that was about it ... there wasn't much more. KNOW the city you're programming to. The Chicago music scene has a very rich heritage and was key to the sound of the '60's ... but if you listen to the station (and I swear that I no longer know a single person who does!), there really are no more '60's in the mix. "Classic Hits" ... the format that Jefferies promised the media would set WLS-FM apart from all of the other stations in town ... playing the exact same music ... doesn't allow for much more than John Mellencamp, Steve Miller, Bob Seger, Journey, Boston, Fleetwood Mac, Billy Joel and about six other artists to get played with any regularity.
Ronnie Rice ... one of the leaders of the Chicago Music Scene back then ... is spot on. Know your audience ... or lose them. Jan Jefferies: they're already gone. Simply put, you should be, too.
kk
 
 
Borrowing a page from the never-ending Forgotten Hits soap box, All Access columnist Perry Michael Simon asks ...
Why did you get into radio?
That's not a trick question. I really want to know what drove people to do this for a living. Was it the glamour of being that disembodied voice talking to the world? Was it the desire to be famous, or at least as famous as being a radio host makes you? Was it the need to be heard by as many people at once as possible? Was it hearing one of the greats of the past and thinking that someday you wanted to be him or her when you grew up? Was it not having anything particularly better to do with your life? Was it the allure of hooking up with request line callers? (Don't lie, you know what you did.) What was it?
I thought about that when I saw a press release for a station changing formats this week, and I saw the phrases "Today's Best Music" and "more music" and "the best of 2000s and today," and I wondered ... did anyone get into radio for that? That's focus group speak. It's how we got Mix and Variety and The Station Everyone At Work Can Agree Upon and Silently Resent. Look, I'm not going to argue that some stations do very well with more-music-less-talk and liner card readers and voice tracking and automation. It may very well be the route to victory, in the short term, at least -- I doubt that it'll fend off customizable, skippable streaming music forever -- and I don't begrudge the Lites and Qs and Zs and Mixes of the world their success. But when I hear The Best Of The '80s, '90s and Today, I wonder who can do that for very long without wondering whether there were better career choices, like maybe actuarial work or industrial equipment sales or acupuncturist. If you can do that, more power to ya.
But I didn't get into radio thinking, hey, I want to make the very best Today's Best Music Mix station. I didn't want to do Another Commercial-Free 10-Jamz-In-A-Row. I wanted to be part of something with personality, and something that would ultimately be different. I didn't know what that was going to be, but it ended up being talk radio, and unusual talk radio at that, thanks to management willing to take risks and be patient. And now, there's sort of stagnation there, too.
And if I asked the next generation of adults why they'd want to go into radio, they'd say that they wouldn't. All the reasons we wanted to do radio are no longer reasons to do radio at all. You don't need to go on the radio to reach a mass audience, even an international one. You can get famous much faster, and for free, doing YouTube videos than from doing radio. Radio isn't generating stars like it once did, so there's less "I want to be like him / her" going on. And nobody even calls request lines anymore, so you're back to Craigslist for your hookups.
Which means the radio industry has to take a long, hard look again at where we've gone and where we're going, and how to attract creative people to the business. That's not the same as signing up celebrities to dabble in radio, which is an answer I've been given before; how often does THAT work out? (That, sadly, is a topic with which I have some gruesome personal experience ... ) No, it's more about offering some of the excitement and creative freedom that got sucked out of the medium when everything got focus-grouped into "Today's Best Music." It's offering actual career paths instead of the prospect of being voice tracked out of a job. And, most of all, it's realizing that the long-term prospects for the radio medium, whether over the air or over the Internet, depends on developing content with personality and creativity -- a reason, in short, for people to listen to your station or show or channel rather than an all-you-can-eat jukebox or a customized stream -- and that needs creative, motivated people. You won't get them with "More Music, Less Talk." You won't get them with cookie-cutter Angry Guys In Ties political talk. You won't get them with Your Wacky Morning Zoo Here's Today's Celebrity Birthdays Coming Up Next A Phone Scam. Only an industry that encourages taking chances, that embraces innovation, that isn't locked into doing exactly what the competition is doing because you'd rather take a chunk of someone else's 25-54 billing than grow your own piece of the market ...
... And there I go again, daydreaming. Sorry, I know, I'm talking to myself. I do that a lot. But I have a vested interest in encouraging the radio -- excuse me, the audio entertainment -- industry to grow and prosper. Radio has the resources to be the leader in developing talent for the next era. All it needs is the will to do it, and the desire.
-- Perry Simon
You've heard us say it a thousand times ... when is radio going to get a clue? (There've just got to be THOUSANDS of kids out there today thinking: "Yeah, when I grow up I want to give the time, temp and call letters three times every fifteen minutes ... and then just clam up for the rest of the hour! That sounds like a great career choice to me!!!") Personality and variety is what made radio great ... all we've got now is clone after clone after clone. It USED to be you could tell which station you were listening to by the music they played. Not anymore. They all seem to be working from the play list ... and man, what a bore THAT is!!!  
 
Here's a piece Gary Theroux sent us ... he got it from programming genius John Rook who is singing the same song we are about ignoring what quite likely is the most desirable demographic ... people who actually RESPOND to radio ... and have the disposable income to do something about it!   
THE MONEY DEMO:
PrimeTime Women — The Executive Summary1. Women control most of the consumer spending decisions worldwide, and in the United States, most of the corporate and small business spending decisions as well. In the consumer sector, women bring in half or more of the income in 55 percent of U.S. households. In 27 percent of U.S. households, single women are the sole earner, and 30 percent of working wives out-earn their husbands. Women operate as the “Chief Purchasing Officer” in almost all households, and are estimated to make 80 percent of all household buying decisions. This includes handling the majority of purchasing in such traditionally male categories as investments, automotive, consumer electronics, and home improvement. In corporations, they constitute 50 percent of managers and professionals, 58 percent of purchasing agents and managers, and 53 percent of wholesale and retail buyers. In addition, they make most of the decisions on office equipment, services and supplies, and employee financial and insurance plan providers. In the small business arena, women have accounted for 70 percent of all privately held startups over the last 15 years. Their growth in numbers, employees, and revenues has outperformed the general economy by two-fold, three-fold and four-fold, respectively. Women are different from men, and their buying decisions are based on different attitudes, priorities, and decision styles. To be effective in marketing to them, companies need to apply different messages, media, and communication approaches. The insights and principles of the GenderTrends Marketing Model set forth in my first book, Marketing to Women, will help companies reap significant competitive advantage, resulting in sales and share boosts, as well as increases in customer satisfaction among both men and women.
2. PrimeTime Women — women 50–70 years old — control spending for the households with the most money. With the aging of the Baby Boomers, the population of consumers over 50 is growing astronomically fast (up 45 percent from 2000 to 2020), while the population under 50 is actually declining (down 2 percent 2000 – 2020). These consumers have enormous economic clout. They’re in their peak earning years and expect to continue working well into their 70s. They already control 79 percent of the financial assets in the United States and will keep accumulating more, as they continue to bring in two paychecks, and add to that some inheritance money from their parents. They have the greatest discretionary spending power of all consumer segments, because their expenses decline when their kids launch their own households. On a per capita basis, consumers over 50 spend 2.5 times what the average person spends. Women over 50 exert greater spending influence than women under 50, as they handle more of the household decisions independently of their husbands; as their children consult them on spending decisions in their own newly established households; and as they become an increasing percentage of the older population.
3. Boomer women are the first generation of PrimeTime Women and are radically different from any generation of women in history. This is the dawn of PrimeTime. Thirty years ago you couldn’t call the ages between 50 and 70 years old “PrimeTime.” Advances in awareness, knowledge, and practice of new health, wellness, fitness and nutrition behaviors has extended life expectancy by more in the past 100 years than in the 1,000 years preceding it. More important, the quality of life has been substantially enhanced; in effect, rather than an extra ten years being added to the end of life, they have effectively been added to the middle of life. Both men and women in their 50s and 60s report these to be the happiest decades of their lives. At the same time, Boomer women have shattered the mold of how women have lived their lives for all the generations before them. They are the first generation of women to attend college in numbers
about equal to their brethren; the first to enter the workplace en masse, with the majority bringing home a paycheck of their own; the first to have control of whether and when to have children, which significantly
affects job seniority and career progress; and the first to win regulatory rights that give them control of their own financial matters equal to men. Relative to previous generations of women, these are far from small, incremental changes. They are a radical transformation of women’s role in the household, political, and economic infrastructure of our society. This represents a watershed opportunity for marketers. Never
before have consumer households had such substantial spending power, driven by the advent of two-paycheck households, and the increased longevity to accumulate spending power over time. Never before have there been so many consumer goods available and relevant to fulfill wants and desires beyond basic food, clothing, and shelter needs — goods like travel, consumer electronics, telecommunications, financial instruments, entertainment, and many more. And never again will marketers have the opportunity to be first to market with this new cohort of high-spending consumers.

4. Most marketers are missing the boat and the opportunity because they’re trapped in their own outdated stereotypes. First of all, we in the Western world suffer from a bad case of youth myopia. On an emotional level, as a culture, we aspire to the characteristics of young people — energetic, high-spirited, physically
strong, impulsive, and colorful; and we are ignorant about the true qualities of older people — experienced, resilient, even-tempered, patient, intuitive. We let ourselves be buried in all the baggage that comes along with the only terms we have had for the midlife market: “middle-aged,” “mature,” “aging,” and “senior” all carry connotations of dumpy, frumpy, sober, and slow. Not surprisingly, none of those descriptions sound particularly appealing to today’s marketers, even those at senior levels of management who may themselves be PrimeTimers and ought to know better. Second, marketers either truly believe, or proffer as a rationalization, the explanation that young people are the prospects with the most lifetime sales potential. “Get ’em while they’re young,” they say, “and they’ll buy your brand for life.” Nonsense. That may actually
have been true back when there weren’t that many brands to choose from in the 1950s, and when most brands enjoyed a substantial and perceptible point of difference versus their competitors. That was 50 years ago, folks. In today’s marketplace, where consumers are confronted by an excess of choice, and many categories are seen as collections of fairly interchangeable commodities, everybody tries new stuff all the time. And in fact, the research shows that older people are actually at least as likely to try something new than younger people — probably because their needs, preferences, and priorities are changing and they are looking for new options. Moreover, anyone who thinks “Well, at least younger people have lots more purchase cycles in them than older people do,” might want to do their homework and check their facts.
They might be surprised to learn, for example, that of the 13 cars that an average household buys over its “lifetime,” seven — the majority — are bought after the head of household reaches 50. It baffles me when I read that marketers are worried that their customer base is “older,” that they are desperate to reach younger consumers, that they are willing to pay substantially more for media that reaches younger people, that programmers and content developers are scrambling to develop properties to deliver younger audiences. Twenty-somethings and thirty-somethings are lovely people, but as prospects, they have a fraction of the spending power of the generation ahead of them. Personally, if I were a marketer looking for
a competitive advantage, while the rest of the market duked it out over the young buyers that have no dough, I would court the consumers who have the most moolah. Call me crazy.

5. To effectively market to the PrimeTime Woman, you have to understand who she really is. PrimeTime Women regard their 50s and 60s as the prime of their lives. Unlike PrimeTime men, they don’t experience midlife as a crisis; to them it’s more like a liberation. What psychologists have characterized as the “empty nest,” supposedly a time of loss and sadness, PrimeTime Women experience as “the next quest,” when after
decades of suppressing their own preferences and passions in favor of focusing on family needs, they are finally free to return to themselves, to experience “My Time.” They’re healthy, strong, and energetic, and the launch of the kids frees up time and money to pursue old passions and explore new possibilities.
Menopause, far from being the mysterious mood monster that takes over their lives, is well under control, and actually brings a bonus — post-menopausal zest, as Margaret Mead called it, a boost in energy experienced as increased creativity and productivity. PrimeTime Women are mentally strong, and getting stronger every day. And their new awareness of their mortality gifts them with both a greater appreciation for life and a stronger sense of legacy, the urge to contribute and give back. Thanks to hormone shifts, combined with their greater life experience, they feel more assertive, confident in themselves, resilient and capable of handling whatever life throws at them. PrimeTime brings more peace, equanimity, strength, confidence, appreciation, and perspective. They’re at a stage of human development when they experience
greater drives for authenticity, to find and behave as their “real selves,” rather than their youthfully created “social selves,” and they feel free to exempt themselves from many of the social constraints and conventions that bound them when they were younger. Contrary to popular opinion, PrimeTime Women are not in denial about their age or appearance, not fighting tooth and nail to retain or reclaim their “lost” youth. Sure, gravity happens; everything is a little less firm, a little less smooth, a little more bumpy here and there. But unlike their younger selves when they were in their 40s, Prime-Time Women have made peace with their appearance. They care about looking their personal best and are glad to avail themselves of help from nutrition, exercise, clothing, hair color, and cosmetics, but marketers who think they are desperate to look 20 are completely missing the point. The PrimeTime Woman redefines beauty on her own terms, and it is anything but skin deep. Instead, it comes from a combination of her external physical features, which she is comfortable with, and her internal self-confidence, which radiates strength and serenity. She thinks she looks great, and she doesn’t appreciate marketers who tell her she doesn’t measure up.

6. Marketers who understand the new dynamics of the PrimeTime consumer market, and the new dimensions of the PrimeTime Woman, have many ways to leverage these insights into major business opportunities. The first opportunity is simply to recognize PrimeTime Women as a high-opportunity market segment, and instead of “worrying” about having too many older consumers, count yourself lucky and
court these big spenders before your competitors figure it out. And before you invest the billions it takes to open foreign markets, jumping the hurdles of unfamiliar customs and alien regulations, make sure you haven’t overlooked the customers in your own backyard. Second, develop new products to serve PrimeTime Women’s merging needs as they move into midlife, changing physically and developing new lifestyles. You have a large segment of prosperous consumers who have needs that have never been explored before.
Opportunity? I think so. Third, use your new insights to boost the effectiveness of your marketing programs and communications. Get more bang out of every buck in your sales and marketing budgets by developing and tailoring your marketing programs to better align with PrimeTime Women’s gender culture. And enhance the breakthrough, relevance, and appeal of all your marketing communications by both reflecting and speaking to PrimeTime Women’s real priorities and interests. Don’t make the catastrophic mistake of thinking this opportunity applies only to those industries conventionally thought of as “senior categories:” hearing aids, medicines, fiber products, recreational vehicles, orthopedic shoes, and anti-aging potions. This book has provided myriad examples of industries that can and will grow based on PrimeTime Women’s opening up to new activities, interests, needs, and priorities.
7. PrimeTime Women are the healthiest, wealthiest, most educated, active, and influential generation of women in history. This is their PrimeTime. And it’s your prime marketing opportunity. PrimeTime is the Promised Land, and PrimeTime Women hold the key. It is a moment of marketing opportunity unparalleled in history. Never before. Never again. Don’t miss your chance to win the hearts, minds, and business of Boomer big spenders — PrimeTime Women."