Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Why The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame Will Never Live Up To Its Promise and Potential

Mr. Onesti's review reads like one of my actual dreams, where I go from room to room seeing these great musical idols or I am traveling, bumping into them along the way.  Not sure if I would have been able to talk coherently if I were there.  Doesn't it sound like the made-up stories of that kid who sat next to you in school?  (exhale) But this was real!!  Amazing!!!
Shelley Sweet-Tufano
I think EVERY person on this list would have loved to experience a night like that ... but I, too, think I would have been tongue-tied.  (kk)

*****

However, the future prognosis for The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame is not good ... most of us have been upset with the ways and means of this organization for a good number of years now ... but after reading this article in Rolling Stone last week, I am now CONVINCED that the situation will NEVER improve ... and, in fact, has only gotten worse ... and that's a REAL shame.  The potential and foundation on which this organization was built has clearly been lost in the shuffle somewhere.
 
Originally designed to spotlight only the artists who made the greatest contributions to moving rock music forward, both as an art form and expanding its horizons, head and shoulders above the rest ... outstanding in their field ... one cannot help but wonder how you enshrine side by side artists like Chuck Berry, Elvis Presley and Bill Withers ...  The Beatles, The Beach Boys and Leonard Cohen ...  Stevie Wonder, Buddy Holly and Bonnie Raitt or Percy Sledge.
 
The scales have been tipped, never to return to "even" again.  Is Green Day a great band?  Yes, they are.  Were they extremely popular and innovative for their time?  Yes, they were.  Do they belong in The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame?  Probably ... but NOT at the expense of long over-looked artists like Chicago, The Guess Who, The Moody Blues, Yes, Electric Light Orchestra, Three Dog Night, Chubby Checker, Freddy "Boom Boom" Cannon, Tommy James and the Shondells ... and SO many others that have not only been continually passed by ... but have never so much as ever even graced the ballot.
 
Check out this article from Rolling Stone (run by the same Jann Wenner who has thrown his weight around for YEARS controlling The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame) and you will see that we are forever doomed to ignore the artists who GOT us here ... in favor of the newly eligible acts, up for consideration solely on the basis that they have paid their necessary 25-year dues, rather than their actual achievements and contributions ...
 
The annual Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction ceremony was held this past weekend at Cleveland's Public Hall. Green Day, Ringo Starr, Bill Withers, Lou Reed, Joan Jett & the Blackhearts, Stevie Ray Vaughan and Double Trouble, The "5" Royales and the Paul Butterfield Blues Band all entered the institution, and every living inductee was on hand to perform.   
 
Now we have a question for you: Who should enter the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 2016? Anyone that released their first album or single in 1990 or earlier is fair game. Newly eligible acts include Smashing Pumpkins, Blur, A Tribe Called Quest, Alice in Chains and the Black Crowes. There's obviously also a huge list of previously eligible acts, including N.W.A, the Smiths, Sonic Youth, Pixies, the Replacements, the Cure, Joy Division, New Order, Devo, Cheap Trick, Television, Yes, King Crimson, Deep Purple, Motorhead, LL Cool J, De La Soul, the New York Dolls, MC5 and Depeche Mode. Vote for whatever act you want, but please only vote once and only for a single selection.   
 
You can vote here in the comments, on facebook.com/RollingStone or on Twitter using the hashtag #WeekendRock.
 
So here's the deal ... 
 
Last week, under the pretense of misleading the public to believe (even for a minute!) that they have ANY say or influence over who is and isn't nominated for future Rock Hall consideration, Rolling Stone Magazine (aka Jann Wenner) asked the public who THEY think most deserves a spot on the future ballot.  Nice gesture, right?  Except the fact of the matter is that Jann Wenner ... and The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame ... have NEVER cared about what the public thinks ... in fact, I'm convinced that they go out of their way every year to nominate two or three "head scratchers" that the majority of the world isn't familiar with, just to get the "What the fuck's up with that?!?!?" reaction that manages to steal a few news headlines each and every time.
 
Then, after they ask you who YOU think deserves a spot on the ballot, they then go on to list the people that you (the unknowing, unsuspecting, uneducated, uninformed and unopinionated public) would most likely want to choose from ... in other words, presenting their OWN list of artists from which to choose, narrowing the list down to HUGE, nationally known artists like The Smashing Pumpkins, Blur, A Tribe Called Quest, Alice In Chains, The Black Crowes, NWA, The Smiths, Sonic Youth, The Pixies, The Replacements, The Cure, Joy Division, New Order, Television, Motorhead, LL Cool J, De La Soul, MC5 and/or Depeche Mode, each of whom REVOLUTIONIZED Rock And Roll Music with their earth-shattering, innovative and inventive ways.  (Can anybody out there tell me how ANY of these acts qualifies to even make the ballot!!!) The ONLY vintage acts on this list are Yes, Deep Purple and Cheap Trick, all of whom have made our "Deserving And Denied" List in the past.  Devo?  The New York Dolls?  (They've been suggested several times in the past and never made it in.)
 
What you DON'T see on this list is ANY indication that The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame is going to do ANYTHING about the TREMENDOUS number of oversights they've had in the past.  Notice that there is absolutely NO mention of Chicago, The Guess Who or The Moody Blues ... Electric Light Orchestra ... The Doobie Brothers ... Chubby Checker ... Freddy Cannon ... The Turtles ... The Monkees ... Tommy James and the Shondells ... and so many OTHERS that have made our list in the past.

Instead, Jann Wenner, founder of Rolling Stone, (who also heads up the nominating committee for the rock hall) continues to exercise his power to insure that the candidates HE feels most worthy get in, regardless of what the public thinks.  That's why you won't find artists like those listed above on the list ... but "rockers" like Bill Withers and Leonard Cohen are in ... and acts like NWA (Niggaz with Attitude) continue to make the ballot year after year after year, despite the clear message being sent by the select few allowed to vote that they really don't belong in there either.
 
As far as I'm concerned, this is simply proof positive that it isn't going to change or improve their method of selection any time soon.  If you haven't already given up on this organization by now (as most of us have), you may as well throw in the towel now ... the artists you grew up with that most influenced YOUR tastes in music don't stand a chance.
 
Let me remind you again of the original mission statement of The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame ... and how they've back-pedaled to avoid inducting artists that they don't think are worthy enough to belong:
 
Rock and Roll and its artists are viewed in an incredibly subjective manner by any individual brought into the circle of discussion.  As such, there is often widespread disagreement or fracturing of opinion about who is or was a rock artist and what importance did he or she have.
Artists become eligible for induction 25 years after the release of their first record. Criteria include the influence and significance of the artists contributions to the development and perpetuation of rock and roll. 
Nomination and induction into the Hall of Fame is not about popularity, records sales, which label the group is on, or anything other than the process below. The love for, the evaluation of, and the impact of any artist are subjective questions to be answered by the nominators and the voters.  Unlike baseball, football, basketball or hockey, statistics are not relevant.   
The only formal criteria for the performance category is that an artist has to have had their first recording released 25 years ago.  That said, candidates are reviewed and discussed relative to their impact on this music that we broadly call rock and roll.  The innovation and influence of these artists is also critical.  Gold records, number one hits, and million sellers are really not appropriate standards for evaluation.  
People sometimes forget that rock and roll, its artists, and its other participants are viewed in an incredibly subjective manner by any individual brought into the circle of discussion. As such, there is often widespread disagreement or fracturing of opinion about who is or was important and to what degree.  
I really think that all deserving candidates will have their moment eventually.  Unfortunately, it often isn't the time frame they or their fans desire.  In fact, there's not only precedent in our history, but also with the other sports Halls of Fame where many of the legends do not get inducted in the their first year of eligibility, or for many years to come in quite a few instances. 
 
 
So artists like Chicago and Blood, Sweat And Tears that added a whole new dimension to the sound of rock and roll by adding horns are NOT inventive and influential enough to make the cut.  The Guess Who, the biggest selling band in Canadian History, whose music continues to be played around the world daily are NOT considered important enough for consideration.  The Moody Blues and Electric Light Orchestra, who merged symphonic sounds with rock and roll, don't deserve a spot ... but artists like each of the individual Beatles, Neil Young, Stephen Stills, Graham Nash, Lou Reed, Eric Clapton and several others should be inducted MULTIPLE times instead, thus taking the spot that COULD have gone to somebody else previously ignored.  Why induct an artist like Chubby Checker, the ONLY person in the history of rock and roll to top the charts TWICE with the same record, BOTH times igniting an absolute dance sensation that captured the hearts and spirits of both the kids AND the adults ... when you can induct Eric Clapton three times instead???
 
FH Reader Danny Guilfoyles sent us some commentary that ran in Bob Lefsetz's column recently ... it just reinforces everything we've been saying for the past fifteen years.  Most of the artists themselves are fed up with the system ... and no longer care if they get in or not, as the fact that they have been snubbed for so long far outweighs any "honor" that would come with a nomination now, this late in the game.  (The Rock Hall also seems to have a way of waiting until an artist is deceased to honor them, rather than dignify them with an honor while they're still here to enjoy and appreciate it.)
 
 
Many great comments regarding the Rock and Roll Hall Of Fame from members of the music industry in response to a blog by Bob Lefsetz. The majority (all but the final one) are in agreement with the on-going assessment of Forgotten Hits and its readers.
Danny Guilfoyles
 
Bob Lefsetz's original article ...
 
How did we get here? Where the only people who seem to care are those desirous of getting third-rate talent inducted and the old men who are on the nominating committee?
Once upon a time rock and roll ruled the world. They said it would never die.
But it did.
The problem with rock is innovation has stopped. There are some good bands, but they barely test the limits, stretch the dynamics, of those who’ve come before. It’s endless repeats of an old formula. And if you think that’s interesting, you’re probably addicted to your Nintendo 64.
Whereas music has twisted and turned, completely mutated since the core members were inducted.
Now the R&RHOF is all politics. Getting people in. And if you think Ringo Starr deserves to be in as a solo act, you’ve never heard Yes. “Roundabout” means more than all of Ringo’s solo hits combined. But for some reason, prog rock is sorely underrepresented in the R&RHOF.
We’ve all got deserving admittees who are not.
But we’ve given up hope. When KISS and Rush are in before Steve Miller and Kraftwerk, never mind Deep Purple, those who truly care throw their hands in the air and ignore the whole process. They know it’s flawed. That it’s not about artistry, but connections.
And the R&RHOF lumbers on ignorant of the country’s feelings. Making the ceremony bigger, including youngsters for the telecast the same way the Grammys include TV stars. This has got nothing to do with rock and roll.
Once again, rock is dead.
It was killed by greed. Michael Jackson put a stake in its heart with “Thriller.” And everything good dies out. Or how did Billy Joel put it, “only the good die young”?
So close the doors. Throw away the key. The Museum of Modern Art doesn’t include antiquities to broaden its appeal.
Let them have a Hip-Hop Hall Of Fame.
And if we’re lucky, an EDM HOF right next to it.
And while you’re at it, include a POP HOF. With a special one hit wonders exhibit that will draw throngs.
Just like Jann Wenner screwed up his magazine by shrinking its size and then publishing the unsubstantiated UVA rape story, he’s ruined the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame. Through myopia, by wielding tight-fisted control, by being so inside the bubble as to not know what’s going on.
The R&RHOF is the kind of institution people would rather not be a member of. Madonna’s got nothing to do with rock and some inductees are so far from luminaries, it’s laughable.
Rock ruled the baby boomers.
And since the baby boomers have political power and money, they think they can foist their viewpoint upon the country and it will stick. Just like the Koch Brothers believe by spending enough money they can control the narrative, never mind Congress.
Your old road is rapidly agin’
Please get out of the new one if you can’t lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin’
See that the biggest venue in America is the smartphone. And its stars are Snapchat and Facebook and they’re all about getting people to connect and communicate. It’s no longer about top down, but bottom up. The public rules. To see young and old farts blowing smoke at the R&RHOF ceremony is to witness something irrelevant, assuming we’re paying attention at all.


... and the responses it inspired ...
 
 
Bob -
Ha ha! Right on. The music business keep recycling what went before, except they don't know about melody, or want to know about it. Is it still possible to write a compelling melody? Absolutely. But we get recycled simplistic
Rock is now 60 years old! In the 70's big band had only been out of style for 20 years. Now, today's teenagers are still be forced to listen to their grandparents' or even great-grandparents' music.
Yes, music ruled the world, briefly, as it turned out. Now, it's back to selling soap, but maybe, just maybe, there's a kid in a little club somewhere........
Bernie Leadon


Perfect!
Peter Noone


Bob ... 
I do not believe Steve (Miller) will ever be inducted into the R&RHOF as long as he lives, nor do I expect him to win a Grammy. Steve has treated music industry executives with disdain his entire career and most of them really dislike him intensely.
I remember Dick Hodge and I negotiating Steve's contract with Doovid Barskin of Capitol Records ... Steve rejected every counter offer Capitol made and kept asking for more until we got the highest royalty rate in the industry. Glen Campbell had the best rate at that time, and we topped his by a few cents more, and obtained total artistic control for Steve. Steve was obtaining a true measure of success at this time, and he was in a real position to leverage what he wanted, Capitol could not recover any advanced royalties, and had a limited time period to press and distribute Steve's music. Steve had retained all of his publishing rights as well.
Steve is known throughout the industry as not putting up with any Bull Shit from record companies or promoters, and has pretty much operated as his own manager over the years. He has, however, retained an excellent business relationship that has made him a very wealthy man.
For all these reasons Steve and his band are scarcely recognized in "politically" controlled music industry awards and events. I agree with you that the R&RHOF was a well intentioned concept, but has, unfortunately, turned into a misguided joke.
Again, thanks again for being so kind to acknowledge Steve and his contribution to the real Rock and Roll.
At 71, Steve and his band are touring almost continuously performing to sold out venues throughout the World. Remarkably, he seems to be at the peak of his abilities.
Bud Miller


Can you explain why my brothers band Chicago is not in the RRHF? 46 years and 30+ records. So strange how they run that club.
Lauren Scheff


a joke. no joe cocker, chicago, yes, todd r, sting etc. but the e street band is honored even though they're essentially a backing band that has never written a song and were fired by their boss in the 80's (oh....sorry, certainly bruce's wife deserves this over other viable candidates). in fairness, induct tom petty's heartbreakers who at least contribute to the music and have been by his side for an entire career. what started as honoring great artists who represented a true american art form has disintegrated into another vapid tv awards show. what a shame.
Michael Leon

 
Bob -
You want the Hall of Fame to be relevant? Put photographers in it.
And I am NOT lobbying for myself - far from it.
People like Jim Marshall, Gered Mankowitz, David Gahr, David Bailey... and later on Ethan Russell, and others ....those were my heroes growing up. They were the people that brought the music to life on every album cover and on the pages of the handful of magazines that ran rock photos back then.
They deserve to be recognized and honored as much as any band or artist you can think of.
Neal Preston
Ps - Emerson Lake and Palmer!
(Actually, Emerson, Lake and Palmer is another GREAT suggestion ... more Progressive Rock ignored by The Hall ... they should make our Deserving and Denied List as well! --kk)

normally i don’t chime in on your commentary
in this instance I feel compelled to
The Rock and Rock Hall of Fame has been reduced to Jann Wenner’s personal toy anda feeble excuse for a HBO Special.
Oddly enough the recent I Heart Radio special on NBC was a better reflection of music television than the Hall of Fame show
or for that matter this years Grammys
John Beug


Right on the money, Bob. No Steve Miller? That is a joke. Soon artists will start to think about asking for their names to be removed. Watch it happen.
Guy McCreery


Amen from a good friend of Steve's. I just asked him about that the other night after a show in Austin.
Watt Casey, Jr.


Is King Crimson in?
What about our friend Steve Lukather's band Toto? (I'm serious Bob)
These groups made incredible records and sonically in their era were the master records
Maybe they should do this every 4 years like they used to do the Olympics
For that matter what about Mariah? Didn't she assist in the biggest era in the industry....
I mean no disrespect to Ringo as I love him and his band is all our close friends in a revolving door
Doobie Brothers/ Chicago?
Who knew
Chris Apostle
King Crimson has made a number of our ballots over the years ... but have since fallen out of The Top 50.  I think Toto is a GREAT suggestion, however.  (kk)

ELO / Jeff Lynne
Chicago
Cheap Trick
Yes
Harry Nilsson
Joan Jett
Deep Purple...
Never mind. I give up. This makes my soul hurt.
Trey Callaway


Hi Bob,
Thanks for this. I'm not so upset about Ringo getting in as I am the class with him: Green Day and Joan Jett do NOT belong in the Hall before Steve Miller, Todd Rundgren, Yes, the Monkees, Paul Revere and the Raiders, and especially Chicago, who'd been a top-selling band for more than 30 years.
Peace,
Tony Pizza


Don't forget to add Chicago not being nominated, you should write about the politics between them and RS. Jokingly adding maybe it had something to do with naming their albums as numbers instead of titles (except one or two I recall).
long time fan (of yours of course)
Frankie Ball


What can the criteria be if it took Hall and Oates this long and Chicago still aren't in? Forget Todd Rundgren or Little Feat.
Hall of Fames should follow some chronology (older bands first) not hop around in time with no apparent rhyme or reason.
But while the induction process may be a frustrating head scratcher, the exhibits and artifacts resonate with any music lover. Lennon's hand-written lyrics, Beck's Fender Broadcaster from "Having A Rave Up", Janis' Porsche, the Temps gold-plated mic stand, a piece of Otis' plane,
John Cipollina's amp and guitar, Rod Argent's electric piano, etc.
The R&R HOF+M is absolutely a great place to visit if you happen to find yourself in Cleveland.
A lot of these pieces are real goose bump material and the beauty is everyone experiences them in their way. Neither Jann Wenner nor politics can screw that up.
William Nollman


And how about the ACM Awards being in a 75k Seat venue if that's not about money than I don't m ow what is...
Matt Gaines


Bob, the rock 'n roll Hall of Fame has been a piece of shit for a long time. They are people who don't know good music. It's a joke.
Nick Wegener


Happy to see Rush, SRV & Bill Withers get in .... Besides Yes, what about Deep Purple, Journey, Bad Company, Iron Maiden, Scorpions, UFO, Judas Priest, Boston, Foreigner, and , Pearl Jam?
Shawn Kilmurray


It's all about the numbers on the telly! Like last night with one of the Jonas' Spawn on the ACMs. Country, my foot! They were there for the viewing numbers, not the Country rep. And, anyway, most country nowadays is second-rate classic rock. Dregs.
And that troublesome HOF...we'll never see deserving artists like Paul Revere and the Raiders, Procol Harum, Warren Zevon or Poco in there. What a joke.
-Sean Anglum / Colorado Springs, CO


Glad you mentioned Yes as that's a good example
Roger Maltby


Bob;
I agree with you 100%; however a much better example of your Yes point would be Procol Harum ,who were always a far better live band (I saw both in concert in the early 70's), recorded more accomplished and innovative albums and leave a far more dynamic legacy than Yes ever can.
Stephen Dessau


It's interesting that you mentioned the band "Yes". Yeah that is a real head scratcher. They basically invented a genre.
An outstanding band and they certainly should be in there.
Peter A. Barker


Bob,
R&RHOF…A bunch of Music luminaries getting together to pat each other on the back telling each other how great & rich they are.
RS


My two biggest complaints about this year's class: Joan Jett and Bill Withers. I like Bill Withers music a lot. Soulful voice, great melodies. Good enough to be among the "elite?" Not a chance. And don't get me started on Joan Jett. I went nuts on her on my podcast, Top 5 Records, because she is terrible. All of her hits are covers. Hate Myself... isn't a cover but it's a fucking horrible song! If she is getting credit for The Runaways, why not induct Lita Ford? Did her solo music really influence anyone? Did it bring us Miley Cyrus? Thanks for nothing!
Pete Guzik

Bob,
I am not disagreeing with you (I don't think, I'm not sure), but if the Hall of Fame were simply called the "Music Hall of Fame" would you feel any better? I would because the RRHF includes some amazing inductees...who have nothing to do with Rock, the genre.
How do you deny a true artist like Bill Withers, who is in all ways qualified for the kudos--except that he's not Rock? You don't. You include him--you make sure that future generations know his name by virtue of a permanent account. But you don't call the damned building in which his memory resides the RRHF.
Kyle Osborne


I dearly wish that what you've written here is somehow not true. I really do.
But everyone who has lived a life of music knows that it is.
And they thought the Hindenburg was a disaster....
Dave Dalzell


Steve Perry hasn't been inducted so RRHOF is irrelevant.
Lisa Gregory


The RRHOF is a business. It has no true relevance to the music.
Frank Gagliano


Bob,
The R&RHOF reminds me a lot of the Hollywood walk of Fame. Used to be you had to be one of the classic bona fide Stars. Now you just cough up the dough.
Kaley Cuoco is getting a star?? Clint fricken Eastwood doesn't have one??!!
I think Kiss and Rush deserve to be in, but Madonna and NOT Deep Purple??!! And of course a band like Yes, can the committee NOT recognize the talent in that band??!! I also love Steve Miller's early work
All other genres can get their own HoF, leave Rock n' Roll the hell alone.
Cheers
Mitch Nixon


Bob,
I hope I won't live for the day when Skrillex is inducted before Tommy Bolin.
Great post.
Rob Penland


Chicago, Grand Funk
RR, J Geils, YES, Moody Blues!!!
Why us one hit wonder Percy Sledge in RR HOF and other one or two hit wonders ?
Poetics of dancing when rappers and one hit wonders are in it BS!
Thanks
Doak Turner


Hi Bob,
I love your blog and never responded before, but I think I can go one better. When Jim Henke was curating for the opening of the museum, I spoke to him about Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller's incredible collection of historical memorabilia. This included the 78 of Big Mama Thornton's "Hound Dog" with the actual Cash Box race charts from 1953, the Hound Dog contract co-signed by their mothers...they were only 19 when they wrote it, a 78 of "K C Lovin," the original Kansas City by Little Willie Littlefield, etc etc. There were boxes that included rare session photos of the Robins, Coasters, Drifters, Brill Building shots, young Mike and Jerry with Elvis. Tom Dowd, Nesuhi and Ahmet Ertigun. Mike and Jerry were the very first independent Music Producers when hired by Atlantic -a title that Ahmet deemed appropriate and it then became a thing.
I say this because after logging for a month and shipping these treasure boxes, just a very few of these items went on display, along with one or two things from Doc Pomus and a few others in a small case in the back of a room. Michael's glove, rock star costumes were in full regalia.
Decisions were out of Jim's hands and politics ruled before the museum even opened.
Bobbi Marcus


You know what killed Rock N' Roll? No one is writing to survive. There were times when the only route they had off of the streets was through their music. Now suburbia kids are playing like they're the Ramones and it ain't workin'. Desperation fuels creativity.
Hip Hop boomed because of the same thing. Rappers literally had to write hit songs or die or starve. Now that industry is also falling to kids of comfort.
Folk on the other hand is exploding. You know why? Go to Folk Alliance International or the Folk Music Ontario Conference in Canada and you'll see why. Most of these artists are gypsy's. They have to write to survive. They go from Folk Festival to Folk Festival in the summer bumming rides or scrounging bus fair. They have to write their way out. Just a few years ago main streamers would frown at the very word 'Folk'...now the stuff is all over HOT radio and the big stars are trying to add acoustic guitars just to fit in.
Give me desperation again...great art comes from great pain.
largemanagement



The one thing I find baffling is how Hip-Hop and Rap still looks and sounds exactly the same since its emergence into the main stream back in the late 80's/early 90's. I'm not talking about Ice T or Ice Cube or Wu Tang Clan of old but seriously the look hasn't changed, the attitude hasn't changed and it's all about the bling, bitches and ho's. I don't get it, that's like the industry churning out the same big hair 80's bands to this day. That would be laughable but Hip-Hop and Rap continue today with the same look and crap and it's considered hip/current and they're still making a ton of money doing it.
Will it ever go away like rock did? I doubt it and that about sums up the attitude of the listening public today. EDM will continue albeit without innovation there will be this Generation Me listening and breaking hips in the old folks homes when it's there time to be put out to pasture.....
This is what's wrong with music today, people listen to what they are told to listen to and if there is a star involved and they worship the hype, they'll always be the mindless sheeple who will follow it.
mmpoppa1


Hi Bob
I agree with so much of what you said.
I never pay attention to the Hall of Fame. But this year it had my attention.
I was 17, lived in Montreal and discovered a little club / coffee house called the New Penelope. I went there like an acolyte going to the alter of music. Didn't matter what it was called. But it was all damn good at the Penelope.
I saw many blues and roots legends. And I was introduced to the sounds of south side Chicago by the Paul Butterfield Blues Band. On multiple occasions I sat about 10 feet away from them in this little gem of a club. They changed my life. I've never forgotten those days. I had never experienced anything like it. A club that held probably no more than 150 people. No liquor. Didn't need it. We had killer music. And I was being baptized at the fountain of music.
So when I heard that the Paul Butterfield Blues Band were being honoured, I was very very happy.
I wasn't in Cleveland last night. I couldn't watch it on TV. Didn't matter. I was, in my head back at the New Penelope in the kind of venue I love watching and listening to the best electric blues band I have ever heard. Yeah and I was only 10 feet from the stage. No one screaming. Just digging it.
Good for Paul, Michael, Elvin, Mark, Jerome, Sam et al.
Regards
Bob Bisnett


Back in the mid-90s, I was a rising young gun in the advertising industry. One of my shop's clients was the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame + Museum. We were their first agency, as I recall. Oddly dull and uncreative client to work on. The decisionmakkers LOVED Elvis, the Beatles, Buddy Holly and 70s rock. They had little regard for Blues, electric blues which birthed rock and roll. Hell, even the phrase "rock n roll" was old Black Blues jukejoint slang for sex/raucous times—not that anyone connected with the rock hall then knew or cared. They'd jump through hoops courting white artists they dug/thought would be draws to loan them memorabilia/make appearances. Some even got compensated for loaning their stuff out. But the Black artists? Not so much. If you gave the hall something, it was an honor to be asked and you'd better have obliged The Hall's requests - for free. If you didn't play ball, then screw you. (ask around, you find that that was their m.o. for more than a few years
.)
When we started on the account we had to go visit the place as it was being built/renovated - in Cleveland, which had as much rock n roll authenticity as Iggy Azaela has hiphop. My first trip to the place it didn't just look like a museum, it looked like a set piece out of the Bonfire of the Vanities - stale, sterile, white, glass, metal... Nothing "rock" or "roll" about it.
The story we got from a couple board members was originally the RRHOF was gonna be in New York which supposedly beat out Chicago and Memphis; but Ohio came thru with a bid at the last minute. And since was OH was already home to more hall of fame's than anywhere else in the US (mostly sports related ones) and they had connections and a system in place for building more HOFs, not to mention a ton more open land to work with than New York, so their bid won.
In short, the Rock Hall was literally built on politics, cash and connections from the jump.
So what you're seeing today is what you've seen for decades... just the RRHOF being the RRHOF. It is what it is now, because that's what it was always meant to be.
such is life.
Hadji Williams


Bob,
You make some very good points about the lack of innovation and envelope-stretching on the current rock scene. That's like shooting fish in a barrel.
And of course there is a lot of controversy and probably a somewhat flawed process of how artists get inducted into the Hall of Fame.
But from my perspective I just have to say that there are a lot of artists who see being inducted into the Hall as a career validation -- a reward for giving so much music to so many people for so many years. An honor from a group of folks, many of whom are peers (all inductees vote in subsequent years).
I don't think that's unfair or necessarily a bad thing.
Sure there are probably a number of artists who maybe shouldn't have been inducted. And sure, we all have a list of artists we believe should be inducted.
That's not a whole lot different than the Baseball Hall of Fame, or probably most, if not all, Hall of Fame institutions across the board.
OK, so we all could have done without Fallout Boy doing the induction welcome speech for Green Day -- I would have though they could have come up with any number of intriguing better choices there. But that was really the only "false" note last night.
I, like you, celebrate music every day of my life. Sometimes in the privacy of my own home, sometimes at a concert, sometimes in my car, and sometimes at events like the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Induction ceremonies or a MusiCares tribute event, etc.
The main thing is that we all celebrate the music and the people who have made the music that we love and has meant so much to us.
Toby Mamis
 
Interested parties can subscribe to The Lefsetz Letter here:  http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
(He's a bit too "angry old man" for me ... and he'll sometimes flood your mailbox with two or three commentaries a day ... but he is certainly well-respected in the music industry ... and literally EVERY artist who's ANYBODY reads his columns.)  If you like the stuff we do here in Forgotten Hits, my guess his that you'll enjoy his take as well.  Although to the best of my knowledge we've never been mentioned in his rantings and ravings, I DO find that he seems to cover a lot of the same topics that we do ... this month, for example, you'll find his take on The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame Nominating and Induction Process ... as well as a list of The Top Ten Songs From This Date in 1965 ... all just a coincidence, I'm sure!!!  (kk)
 
**********


THE DESERVING AND DENIED LIST:
 
Good things come to those that wait ... or so we're told.
 
Since our series on The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame first ran back in 2007, several artists from that list HAVE finally been inducted.  These include:
 
ABBA, The Dave Clark Five, Alice Cooper, Neil Diamond, Genesis, Daryl Hall and John Oates, Heart, The Hollies,  Joan Jett, John Mellencamp, Linda Ronstadt, Leon Russell, Donna Summer and The Ventures ...
 
Fourteen acts that at one time made our list of Top 40 Deserving and Denied Artists
 
 
*********************
 
 
When we run our list of "Deserving And Denied" Artists, those who don't follow the day-to-day activities of The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame are often SHOCKED to see some of the names on this list.  They simply cannot believe that these artists have not been honored by Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame ... they just ASSUMED that, with the INCREDIBLE track record established by each and every one of these acts, they just HAD to have been inducted by now ... but, incredibly, this is NOT the case.  (Instead, we're subjected to yearly ballots that regularly include artists like Niggaz With Attitude and Afrika Bambaataa.)
Based on your votes in years past, here is the most up-to-date list of Deserving And Denied Artists we've been able to assemble:
 
 1. Chicago  (going on 50 years and STILL cranking out new music, Chicago embraced and reinvented a brand new blend of rock and jazz)
 2. The Moody Blues
 3. The Guess Who  (you'll find less than a dozen Canadian acts enshrined since The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame first began in 1987)
 4. Yes  (very little in the way of Progressive Rock is on their list, too)
 5. The Zombies
 6. Jan and Dean
 7. Chubby Checker  (the ONLY artist to top the charts TWICE with the same record ... AND start a national dance craze embraced by all generations)
 8. Pat Benatar
 9. Jethro Tull  (talk about taking rock in a new direction, how do you overlook THESE guys???)
10.  Ed Sullivan  (How is it possible that the man who brought rock and roll into the living rooms of MILLIONS has never been honored for his contribution to the "selling" of rock and roll???)
11. Steve Miller
12. The Monkees (yes, they were "manufactured" ... but they've never left our hearts ... or our tv screens!)
13. Three Dog Night   (three lead vocalists, each of whom could hold their own with the best of them ... how is THIS not Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame worthy)
14. Deep Purple
15. The Electric Light Orchestra  (like The Moody Blues above them on this list, orchestrating Rock And Roll with symphonic overtones)
16. Blood, Sweat and Tears
17. Styx  (make fun of them all you like, these guys have climbed from just outside The Top 40 to #15 over the past eight years, based on our votes)
18. Journey
19. The Doobie Brothers
20. Joe Cocker
21. Connie Francis  (formerly #1 on the list, Connie has fallen these past few years as The Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame continues to ignore more contemporary ... and mass-appealing artists)
22. Pat Boone
23. Poco
24. The Cars
25. Loggins and Messina
26. Tommy James and the Shondells
27. The Spinners
28. The Turtles
29. Paul Revere and the Raiders
30. Herman's Hermits
31. Todd Rundgren
32. Paul Anka  (another Canadian act LONG over-looked)
33. Bachman-Turner Overdrive (ditto)
34. Neil Sedaka
35. Johnny Rivers
36. Billy Preston
37. Dick Dale (as responsible for the whole surf craze as anybody else who's in there)
38. Grand Funk Railroad
39. Peter, Paul and Mary (why is folk music overlooked by The Rock Hall?)
40. Jim Croce
41. Freddy Cannon
42. Herb Alpert (as a performer ... he's in for lifetime achievement ... but what about his INCREDIBLE run on the charts with a whole new sound?!?!)
43. Gary "US" Bonds
44. Cheap Trick
45. The Commodores
46. The Marvelettes
47. The Grass Roots
48. Peter Frampton
49. Harry Chapin
50. Paul Rodgers / Free / Bad Company
51. Glen Campbell  (as either a sideman OR an artist, certainly there's a spot for THIS guy within those hallowed halls!!!)
52. America

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Tuesday This And That

re:  The TRAP Benefit Concert:
Unfortunately, I've been largely out of commission these past few days but I did want to offer one more round of thanks to Robert Colletti, who put together a great line up for a great cause, The Rhythmic Arts Project.  Back on Sunday, April 19th, we rocked The Arcada Theatre with The Cadillac Casanovas, Denny Diamond and The Family Jewels, Members of Rick Nelson's Stone Canyon Band and The New Colony Six.  Hosted by Chet Coppock, Ron Onesti and yours truly, we put together an interesting assortment of musical variety that, admittedly, at times could have been better organized (and certainly more problem-free when it came to technical difficulties) ... yet still managed to touch the heartstrings of those who came, thanks to a very touching and moving video provided by Eddie Turduri, the heart and soul of this organization.  (Eddie's resume is incredible ... this guy has played with just about EVERYBODY over the years ... and it is SO refreshing to see him now giving his time to help those with disabilities and less fortunate than himself.)
If I felt bad about anything at all, it was the fact that we didn't raise as much money as I felt we should have.  Please visit the website and browse around ... see what this group is all about ... and then give what you can.  And, if you were there for the show ... and you had a good time ... please pay a little back to the cause ... as THIS is what this fundraiser was really all about.
More information can be found here:  http://www.traponline.org/
Highlights?  There were quite a few.
First of all its virtually IMPOSSIBLE not to enjoy The Cadillac Casanovas ... without question, one of the most FUN bands you'll ever see in concert.  Not only did I get to introduce these guys on stage, but I also got to spend some time backstage with them as well ... what a GREAT group of guys!
And they're really on a roll right now ... having already played The Surf Ballroom's Annual Winter Dance Party in February, the boys next traveled to Las Vegas for Rock-A-Billy Fest ... so it was a REAL honor to hang out with these guys againwithin the friendly confines of The Arcada Theatre.
Next up came Denny Diamond, who was plagued by technical difficulties for the entire opening of his set.  Thankfully, all was eventually worked out ... and Denny kept the crowd entertained with his great sense of humor (and an assortment of Irish jokes!)  And kudos to both of Denny's sons, who now join him on stage for his Neil Diamond tribute ... but ESPECIALLY to Spenser who spent the entire set playing both bass guitar AND drums simultaneously!!! (It has to be seen to be believed!!!)  I was sitting with original New Colony Six bassist Walt Kemp for this set and told him that if he did ANYTHING less than this for his guest appearance with The Colony, I would be disappointed ... and suggested that he should also, in fact, figure out a way to strap a trumpet to his mouth so as not to be outdone by this young upstart!!!
After a brief auction / intermission, The New Colony Six took the stage, performing most of their hits, along with a Chicago Gold Medley and assorted cover tunes by other bands of this era.
Special Guest Denny Larden sat in with The New Colony Six and performed the 1967 #1 Hit he recorded with Every Mother's Son, "Come On Down To My Boat", which sounded great.  In addition, he sat in with Jay White and Mary Martha and did a BEAUTIFUL tune called "The Man Behind The Man Behind The Guitar", one of the highlights of the entire show.  (Where can I get a copy of this track, Denny?  I loved it!)
All in all, a great night of entertainment ... and all for a very good cause.  Robert told me afterwards that he was hoping to do another benefit concert at some point in time as they would really like to establish a branch of The Rhythmic Arts Project right here in Chicago.  With our rich heritage of local musicians, I think it would be a natural step ... here's hoping we have more to share with you in this regard in the very near future.
Thanks to all who came ... and all who gave ... both of their time on stage to entertain ... and of their hearts for this very worthy cause.  (kk)
 
                                                                                          Me and Ray Graffia, Jr., backstage before the show

re:  On The Radio:
Hello Kent,
Been enjoying your site very much lately.  I've also really been enjoying MeTV-FM.  Several songs they have been playing have reminded me of the old Y103.9 - they would sometimes touch songs no one else would.  That brings me to my point - in the past few weeks on forgotten hits you've mentioned guys like Jim Shea and Jeff James.  How the heck are these two doing?
Out here in Huntley we've got a small community station on 101.5 http://huntleyradio.com .  They run a few programs with older music, it got me thinking how great would it be for somebody like Jeff James to bring back the old Saturday Night 70s program, version 2 so to speak.  The station's listeners are all within the old Y103.9 listening area too!
MeTV is great, but I miss some of the old voices that use to spin our favorite music.  Would love for somebody to land a gig somewhere soon!
- Ed in Huntley
We get at least two or three letters per month asking about the old Y103.9 crew, with folks wanting to check in with Jim Shea and Jeff James just to see how they're doing ... and WHAT they're doing.  The radio industry doesn't really seem to understand the connection that is made between the listener and the on-air personality ... they become part of our lives, someone we can count on every day to hang out with for a while on the way to and from work ... or just in the background during the work day.
In the old Top 40 Hey-Day of Radio, the disc jockey's role was much more pronounced ... there was a genuine respect for what they added to the equation ... and, as a result, many of the jocks were as popular as the artists themselves that they played on the air.  Record hops and such drew huge turn-outs, just so we could see our favorite jocks in person.  With two super power-house radio stations in town, it wasn't at all uncommon to see the disc jockeys move back and forth from one station to the other, each wanting to take advantage of their already established loyal following here in town.
I asked both Jim Shea and Jeff James to say a few words to our readers about where their lives are today ... if they missing being on the air ... what they think about not only the new Me-TV-FM and their expanded playlist and wide variety of music they play ... as well as Y103.9's pretty liberal format, especially when it came to these two guy, pretty much flagship jocks for the station. 
 
Jeff has been pretty vocal of late when it comes to Me-TV-FM ... but Jim Shea we haven't heard from as much.  Here is an update from him that might help to explain why ...   
 
Hi Kent,
Great to hear from Ed and all the fans of Y103.9. Yeah, we did have a very unique thing, especially on the morning show: a "kitchen" where we could go and hash out the issues of the day; a place where we were all on the same side, even with different views, all united in love of the music and the joy that it brought us.
We got to talk (and jam!) with some of the people who made our favorite music and appeared in our favorite tv shows and movies. We talked with, and created some, local celebs. I was trusted and respected by all my various managers there; they let me do my thing and didn't freak out if I took an occasional unpopular stand or played something unfamiliar or shared historical insights.
For the past year I have been at a similarly awesome station in Milwaukee: 94-5 The Lake (WLWK). And loving it! I do a few weekend shifts a week and fill in other times as needed. Musically, it is a true variety format. You will hear Marvin Gaye then Katy Perry then Led Zeppelin then The Lumineers then Blue Oyster Cult then Justin Timberlake. You get the idea. The difference between The Lake and your various Jack formats is the local content we work in over the intros. I have been given a similar green light to that which I enjoyed at Y103.9 in that my content is totally up to me. Again, I'm trusted and respected, so as part-time jobs go, it's a blast.
I won't be in radio much longer though. In my last year at Y103.9 (2010) I had already returned to school, finishing up my degree in bioscience at University of Wisconsin / Parkside. It took a bit longer than anticipated, but on May 16th I graduate, and in August I am headed to medical school at Barry University College of Podiatric Medicine in Miami Florida.  (It is a pretty amazing thing to get in to med school at my age, and many friends simply do not believe it. Mostly those who knew the kind of student I was in high school ha ha ha.)
So to all the great folks involved with Y103.9 back in the day, again, thanks for the experience of a lifetime. 
I'll always love and support radio and broadcasters.  Meanwhile I'm becoming a physician so the price of my bad jokes is about to go up ha ha!  
Speaking of which, if you want an excellent foot and ankle doctor, I'd be happy to help you with that. Although, you may have to come to South Florida. Darn! lol
Jim Shea
 
It's especially tough on the listeners ... and the jocks, too, I imagine, when a radio station changes format and pretty soon your world is rocked upside down because you're no longer part of the plan.  Most often, there isn't even time to say goodbye ... or not a PROPER goodbye anyway ... fans and listeners are simply cut off cold turkey, usually with no explanation.  (So, just how IS The Fox doing these days??!?)
 
Y103.9 was unique in that they were able to expand the typical "greatest hits of all time" concept and give their jocks some leeway into programming some legitimate hit tunes that had simply been "off the radar" for awhile ... and, as such, Forgotten Hits fit in very nicely with this station.  Me-TV-FM is doing much same thing these days, only without the benefit of live jocks on the air holding the whole thing together and making it sound more like a real radio station.  (Not that we don't like the constant streaming or the lack of commercials, mind you ... it's pretty much non-stop music, 24/7 right now ... but there's STILL something about that connection made between a good jock and his audience.  Boy, Me-TV-FM would be well served to pick up a couple of guys like Jim Shea and Jeff James to get things rolling ... BOTH of these gentlemen are TRUE radio aficionados who genuinely LOVE this music ... and, even after all these years, still get a kick out of bringing it to you.  And they have a long-standing, built-in audience of listeners ready to tune in again. Sounds to me like this is at least worth talking about!!!  (kk)
 
Kent,
In today's FH, Paul Evans mentioned Arnie Amber doing a DJ shift with his son Kevin and said that they were the only father - son on air team at the time.
Many years ago here in OKC, we had a father - son air team that worked only on Sunday mornings, going off before noon. Can't really remember their name or how long they were on the air here. It seems like they weren't on for very long. I believe they programmed country music at the time.
I enjoyed immensely the ten songs you posted today. As the Magic Lanterns would have said, "It's a SHAME SHAME these songs are not heard anymore on the radio".
Larry Neal
 
re:  Elvis - The Beatles - And Frank Sinatra:
Kent,
Today you wrote a couple of paragraphs about some comparisons with Elvis / Beatles, that Mariah and Garth are not the same.  I'd be interested to hear your comments on a comparison between Elvis / Beatles and Frank Sinatra, since many bobby soxers did go to see Frank Sinatra the same way 60s teens went to the airport to see Elvis / Beatles.
Jon M
The mania period of Frank Sinatra's career was way before my time ... so I have no first hand recollections or observations from which to draw ... I can only go by what I've heard and read.
There was more to Elvis and The Beatles than just big turn-outs at the airport ... they changed the way we looked, both physically as well as our outlook on life.  They were both a cultural phenomena that transcended SO much further than just their musical contributions ... although their musical contributions inspired literally thousands of others to follow in their footsteps or emulate them through their own music and style.  What was rare about Elvis and The Beatles is that other artists popped up IMMEDIATELY to ride the wave of what they created ... and then joined them side by side to ride that wave.  However, even 50-60 years later, we still see the influence and inspiration.
Taking nothing away from Frank Sinatra ... he could do it all ... sing, act, dance, make people disappear ... he may have been the original teen idol (although now we'll probably hear from Bing Crosby and Rudolph Valentino fans on this, too!) 
He wasn't a "manufactured" idol the way Frankie Avalon or Bobby Rydell or, years later, Bobby Sherman or David Cassidy or Donny Osmond were ... Sinatra elicited a very genuine response from the audience who fell and love with him and swooned to him en masse.  (Yes, there was a mania ... but remember, too, that they literally had to close the streets when Martin and Lewis came to town ... that was probably a better example of mass hysteria at the time than what Sinatra typically generated!) 
However, like The Beatles and Elvis, Sinatra managed to hang on to a VERY loyal audience who stayed with him through to the very end ... and beyond ... so yes, I'd say he had a similar impact ... although there was never really anything to show for it in the way of long sideburns, ducktails, mop-top hairstyles, black leather and boots (Elvis, Beatles or otherwise), etc, etc, etc.  (Much like my Mariah Carey fake boobs / Beatles wigs analogy the other day, I don't remember there being a rush by teenagers to the stores to buy big ears and receding hairlines so that they, too, could look just like their idol!)  
Sinatra was a crooner who sang songs given to him in his own unique style (which was copied and mimicked by many) ... but many of these were "standards" (or became standards) designed to appeal to a much broader audience.  Elvis and The Beatles targeted the kids ... and paved the way with a brand new sound that nobody had ever heard before.  Both went through an extensive period where moms and dads hated them ... while Sinatra played if "safe" by appealing to everyone.  As such, I think Elvis and The Beatles were viewed more as "ours", if you know what I mean ... something us kids could relate to as new and maybe just a little bit dangerous.
I've used this analogy several times before but I still think it fits.  In 1966, at the height of musical creativity ... with artists like The Beatles and The Beach Boys and The Mamas and the Papas and The Rolling Stones and Bob Dylan ... and brand new upstart acts like The Troggs and Tommy James and the Shondells, and The Turtles and The Monkees and so many other "flower power", hard rock, psychedelic acts dominating the music scene and the pop charts, 51 year old Frank Sinatra hit the top of the charts with "Strangers In The Night" ... and we couldn't believe it.  (Or, perhaps more accurately, we were OUTRAGED!!! What was this old man doing on the radio with our favorite pop idols???)  In our minds, he didn't BELONG there ... rock and roll had been well-established by this point ... and Sinatra had no business invading our sacred turf.  Besides, he'd already had his moment in the sun.  Yet today we think absolutely NOTHING about shelling out hundreds of dollars in the hopes of securing a seat to what will most likely be a completely sold out concert by 73 year old Paul McCartney!!!  73?!?!?  20+ years older than Sinatra was at the time!!!  And the guy's performing at The Super Bowl and headlining Lollapalooza for God's Sake!!! 
And then, a year later, Sinatra has recorded a #1 duet with his DAUGHTER?!?!  How DARE he!!!  (Today Tony Bennett sings with Lady GaGa and nobody even blinks!)
Anyway, there's my typical long-winded answer ... not sure what you'll take away from it ... in summary, I guess I'd say, "Yeah, it's KINDA the same ... but it's also WAY different".  (kk)
 
Hey Kent,
Just read the review of The Who concert. 
Do you think "The Beatles: The Next Generation" will ever happen? I'm sure they would like to record and perform all new material and not old Beatles songs. What I understand is that Dhani Harrison, James McCartney, Sean and (maybe) Julian Lennon are interested in getting together, but the only holdout is Zak Starkey. I know he tours with The Who, but I wish he could make a little time for it, because there is huge interest out there. I wonder if Ringo has another drumming child or if Pete Best has any kids. :-)
- John LaPuzza
See that???  From Lollapalooza to Johnny LaPuzza in one swift motion ... ah, the magic of Forgotten Hits!  (lol)
I, for one, certainly hope not.  (Did we learn NOTHING from "The New Monkees"?!?!?)
While I think it would be INCREDIBLY cool to see a one-off performance of The Beatles Kids on TV or something, I think trying to cash in at this stage of the game would be off-putting to most, myself included.  (Julian's gotta be 50-something himself by now, right?  And he already tried the rock career.)
This one just wouldn't work for me ... and I don't believe you can try and "create" a phenomena, no matter what gene pool you start with.  Would it be cool for one incredible show to see them all do something by their famous fathers and then something of their own?  Yeah, probably ... but then record it and preserve it for all eternity.  Anything more than that would never work ... and the critics would eat them alive.  (kk)
 
re:  This And That:  
Tuesday, April 21 at 9:05am · HAPPY BIRTHDAY, ERNIE MARESCA, APRIL 21, 1939 4/21/1939 = Happy Birthday, Ernie Maresca.
Hometown = Bronx, New York. Ernie wrote many songs for Dion. He used the sound of the record "Quarter To Three" to write "Runaround Sue" with Dion. Ernie wrote "The Wanderer" around the hit "Kansas City". In 1962, Danny Kessler of Seville Records suggested that Ernie try singing a song he had written called "Shout! Shout!( Knock Yourself Out )." Marv Holtzman and Murray Spahn, also
of Seville Records, encouraged Ernie to try it to see what would happen. Ernie got together with the Del Satins, the group that backed Dion up on all his hits without the Belmonts and, in March 1962, "Shout! Shout!" became a top 10 hit. After this Ernie went back to writing songs, instead of singing them.
Special thanks to our friend, Frank Buongervino, for the above information.  (Knock yourself out, Frank!)  kk
Just saw the new list you ran for the Arcada Theatre -
You're gonna' love the Bronx Wanderers!
Danny
You know, they actually play here quite often ... and yet I've still never seen them!  (kk)
 
And, speaking of upcoming shows, Henry Gross just sent us some new tour dates ...

Henry will be performing is one-man show "One Hit Wanderer on May 2nd at The Murray Studio Theater, Ruth Eckerd Hall, in Clearwater, FL at 8:00 pm
In addition, Henry will be performing solo acoustic gigs on the following dates:
May 22nd - Lafayette's Music Room, Memphis, TN - 7 pm
June 18th - Port City Cafe, Portsmith, OH
July 3rd - Red Dragon Listening Room, Baton Rouge, LA
 
Dear Forgotten Hits Readers,
I am very pleased to announce my latest radio interview show, which I have posted on the Jersey Girls Sing website.
It is with Will Millar (pronounced "Miller"), the founder and leader of the Irish Rovers. To access it, please click the above link or the one toward the bottom of this message.
"The Unicorn" by the Irish Rovers was surely one of the most unlikely hits of 1968 or, for that matter, any year. The writer was Playboy cartoonist and singer-songwriter Shel Silverstein, who was probably just as surprised when the group hit the top ten with it as the group was.
Will was the lead singer of that fondly-remembered song about those silly unicorns who missed the boat and as a result became extinct. (That's what happened if you believe Shel!) The other three group members on that hit were Will's brother George, Will's cousin Joe and the late Jimmy Ferguson.
Will was with the group for over 30 years. He told me that if it wasn't for his Jaguar breaking down in front of an Italian restaurant, the Irish Rovers may have never achieved stardom! Yes, fate played a huge role in their extremely interesting career. He is a most interesting guy in so many respects!
Ronnie Allen

Monday, April 27, 2015

50 Year Flashback - April 27th, 1965

It's back to the WLS Silver Dollar Survey again this week as they publish yet another "Solid Gold" Chart.  (Silver AND Gold??? Interesting!)

This time around they're celebrating their Fifth Year as a Top 40 Radio Station ... and what a powerhouse they were, too.  With 50,000 Watts beaming a clear signal through the night, you could pick up WLS Radio in nearly every state in the union.  While this gained literally thousands of fans from coast to coast, it would become an even bigger factor in the station's success a few years later when they started promoting some of the local talent starting to make waves here in The Windy City.

But for now ... we seem to have a decidedly British feel to OUR chart, too ...  as 11 of the Top 13 songs on the list belong to British Invasion Artists.

These include Herman's Hermits (#1 with "Mrs. Brown You've Got A Lovely Daughter" and #11 with their remake of "Silhouettes", The Kinks at #2 with "Tired Of Waiting For You", The Beatles with a two-sided hit at #3 ("Ticket To Ride" / "Yes It Is"), Petula Clark right behind them at #4 with "I Know A Place", The Rolling Stones at #6 with "The Last Time", Freddie and the Dreamers at #8 with "I'm Telling You Now", Gerry and the Pacemakers (misspelled as "Gerri"!) at #9 with "It's Gonna Be All-Right", The Seekers at #10 with "I'll Never Find Another You", the aforementioned "Silhouettes" at #11, "Go Now" by The Moody Blues at #12 and "Game Of Love" by Wayne Fontana and the Mindbenders at #13.

The ONLY American Acts to break that spell are Gary Lewis and the Playboys (#5 with "Count Me In") and The Beach Boys, who sit at #7 with "Do You Want To Dance" ... so we've just GOT to feature these two this week!!!

Their 20 Best-Selling #1 Records list is a bit shaken up from previous issues ... but The Beatles still have the Top Three Tracks here on this list, too, with "I Want To Hold Your Hand", "She Loves You" and "Twist And Shout".  (You'll also find The Fab Four at #7, #10 and #15, giving them SIX of the Top 20 Songs from the past five years ... incredible!)

They only dip back to 1960 once, for Ferrante and Teicher's hit "Exodus" ... same thing with 1961 for Lawrence Welk's "Calcutta".  This is a bit surprising as NEITHER of these tunes were the biggest hits of their respective years.  Look at the list closely and you'll see once again that spelling was never really the station's strong suit ... The Singing Nuns (plural)?  The Angeles (huh?)?  At least they finally got rid of those ridiculous apostrophes on The Beatles and The Supremes!

Our favorite jock of the time, Ron Riley, is pictured at the bottom of the survey ... by now his on-air feuds with morning man Clark Weber were legendary ... together, they gave us Personality Radio at its very best.  A "golden" time in radio, to be sure.